What financial advisors can expect from Washington this spring: 8 predictions
Financial reform will move forward, but regulation will move backward
Related Moves
Charles 'Chuck Schwab' called James Gorman to protest a two-broker poach, kicking off a hydra-headed legal battle, costing Morgan Stanley millions, so far
The Schwab founder and chairman invoked Charles Schwab Corp.'s zero-tolerance policy against Wall Street -- or RIA -- poaching of talent and AUM from Schwab branches.
March 9, 2023 at 1:23 AM
Why FINRA's late appearance into smoothie-throwing broker James Iannazzo's life might be rough
It's been about 11 months since Merrill Lynch fired him, and the CFP Board stripped him of the CFP mark; attracting the SRO's attention means more woes.
December 29, 2022 at 1:05 AM
Biz Briefs: SEC cracks down anew on RIA reverse churning ~ Envestnet borrows $350 million to buy its own stock ~ Fidelity is creating a crypto waiting list while exec questions crypto ecosystem
Fed up SEC is ready to take on all nonsense at once; stock shocks, Orwell's new name game; Fidelity hosts a line dance
November 18, 2022 at 2:56 AM
Stephen Winks
To restore the trust and confidence of the investing public why not make Ron Rhoades director of consumer protection at FINRA, or the SEC or as head of the proposed Consumer Protection Agency? If consumer protection were the objective, Ron would be perfect.
But is consumer protection really a regulatory focus, as the laws substantiating fiduciary standing are on the books? It is simply a matter of enforcing existing law—as Ron so aptly demonstrates. Any further leglislative actions are very likely to favor the best interests of the brokerage industry rather than that of the consumer.
There has simply been no one to hold the brokerage/insurance industries feet to the fire. FINRA is fully funded by the brokerage industry and its executives will not bite the hand that feeds them. The majority of the five SEC comissioners support the fiduciary standing of brokers, but Congress, the SEC’s boss, has directed the SEC to “study” what is required for brokers to support fiduciary standing, even though the laws have been on the books for more than a century. The massive brokerage/insurance lobby has had its way with Congress in it temporily delaying the SEC from holding brokers being held to a fiduciary standard of care over the next 12 to 18 months. The risk is how much damage can Congress do in the interim.
At the end of the SEC “study”, the brokerage/insurance industries either need to support “the” fiduciary standard of care without denigration, or prepare to be vulnerable to enterprising advisors who offer a faster, better and cheaper value proposition to consumers who prefer their advisors to act in their best interests.
A brokerage/insurance industry sponsored fiduciary light standard imprudently passed by a Congress, which can not find a way to support existing consumer protections, will not restore public trust. As they say, be careful what you pray for as you may get it. Fiduciary light will do more to harm the insurance and brokerage industries in a competitive market place than it will help. It paints the broker and agent in a corner which is counter to the consumer’s best interest.
In a free market, the consumer’s best interests will be inevitably served, one way or the other by enterprising advisors. The brokerage/insurance industries must openly address costs, transparency and accountability issues in portfolio construction for each client necessary to support continuous comprehensice counsel required for fiduciary standing. Disclosure helps but is no substitute for fiduciary standing.
SCW
