Why advisors see FINRA as the devil
A conversation with Richard Brueckner and Mark Tibergien lends perspective to this widely held view by RIAs of the b/d regulator
Related Moves
Charles 'Chuck Schwab' called James Gorman to protest a two-broker poach, kicking off a hydra-headed legal battle, costing Morgan Stanley millions, so far
The Schwab founder and chairman invoked Charles Schwab Corp.'s zero-tolerance policy against Wall Street -- or RIA -- poaching of talent and AUM from Schwab branches.
March 9, 2023 at 1:23 AM
Pershing restores Ben Harrison as sole heir to Mark Tibergien -- for now -- but solo tenure may be temporary, with other top talent in the wings
Co-Head Maura Creekmore's departure leaves Harrison at the top by default, but the company is mum on future hiring and how much RIA autonomy gets sacrificed in name of 'convergence.'
January 19, 2023 at 3:31 AM
Why FINRA's late appearance into smoothie-throwing broker James Iannazzo's life might be rough
It's been about 11 months since Merrill Lynch fired him, and the CFP Board stripped him of the CFP mark; attracting the SRO's attention means more woes.
December 29, 2022 at 1:05 AM
Biz Briefs: SEC cracks down anew on RIA reverse churning ~ Envestnet borrows $350 million to buy its own stock ~ Fidelity is creating a crypto waiting list while exec questions crypto ecosystem
Fed up SEC is ready to take on all nonsense at once; stock shocks, Orwell's new name game; Fidelity hosts a line dance
November 18, 2022 at 2:56 AM
See more related moves
LPL Financial
RIA-Friendly Broker-Dealer, RIA Welcoming Breakaways, Advisory Firm
Top Executive: Dan Arnold
Harold Evensky
A “Holier-then-thou” splitting of the investment world into “good guys” and “bad guys” is not only unfair, it is counter productive. If we focus less on protecting our turf and more on what will best serve the interest of the investing public and recognize that most advisors, whatever their employment or compensation structure, care about their clients’ best interest, the public will be well served.
How? Congress is likely to finalize a bill that ultimately requires anyone providing personal advice being held to a principal based fiduciary standard. The ultimate regulator of that duty is likely to be FINRA. As a consequence, in order for the final outcome to resemble a world in which all advisors are held to a substantive fiduciary duty, the SEC will have to enact substantive principal based standards and the regulator (e.g., FINRA) will have to honestly and aggressively enforce those standards. As a consequence we (i.e., those of us currently in the RIA world) have two options; #1 – continue to scoff at the SEC’s motives and call FINRA the devil or #2 – work, to whatever extent we can, with the SEC and a future fiduciary regulator to educate them regarding the unique nature of principals based advice and support their efforts.
Although Option #1 may provide a temporary visceral high, it is counterproductive and unprofessional and will result in our voices being ignored. If you believe as I do that advisors across the spectrum of employment and compensation structures believe in placing their clients’ interest first, Option #2 offers hope. I know I’m an optimist; however, after numerous meetings with SEC Commissioners, staff and FINRA staff, I’ve come to believe that both organizations not only understand the differences between Rules and Principals based standards, they beleive in substantive fiduciary principals and strongly support the application of Principal based standards for those providing financial advice. Their quandary is not how to work around Principals but rather how to make Principal based standards work in the real world. Professionals from the current RIA world can be of the greatest help by working with the SEC and future regulators to assist in developing and implementing realistic standards.
Debbie Nixon
I find my clients, RRs and RIAs alike, are most concerned about how to regain lost trust with their clients, regardless of the standard with which they must comply. The level of passion on both sides of the regulatory debate is fueled both by care for the client and legitimate concerns about the viability of their chosen business, neither of which are mutually exclusive. Or are they? An interesting question for an advisor today is: what conversations are you having with yourself and others, and how are those conversations working for you? IF the answer is they are not working to help you build or rebuild trust with clients, then what conversation would?
WSLady
Dont forget, Madoff was a BD audited by FINRA several times and FINRA (under Schapiro) did not catch the FRAUD even though they had the tools and authority to match the Madoff IRA books with the BD and failed to do so. The same situation holds for the fraud at Bayou.
http://erotime.net/index.php?subaction=userinfo&us
It’s these very little nagging details that start to chip away at the iPhone’s veneer, even Nokia’s that choose lower than 50 percent on the iPhone’s cost can meet these rather straightforward requirements. The iphone does have a few redeeming factors, for those workaholics who have Microsoft trade servers at their office the iphone will happily receive your e-mails and that means you will hardly ever be out of contact; and for those who do not really have to deal with all the corporate entire world Gmail and Yahoolmail accounts are supported. Many thanks on the 3G connection the apple iphone web functionality seriously shines, Google Earth and Maps are constructed in, along with weather and stock industry apps.
http://www.helmig.com/vista/vf8boot.htm
The G2 portable oxygen concentrator can be the newest accessory for the moveable oxygen entire world and made to fulfill the altering demands from the occupation to supply unequalled freedom for that energetic G2 Portable Oxygen. To be familiar with much more particulars about consider our web page.Blood insulin Pump Treatment Who will be Ready To profit
