RIABiz

News, Vision & Voice for the Advisory Community

RIABiz

Why RIAs should hedge their fee income to stay aligned with client interests

Clients invest for the long haul and advisors have short-term revenue needs making the AUM model imperfect at best

Author Guest Columnist Robert Boslego June 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM
Admin:
no description available
Robert Boslego: Commodity businesses have found that the benefits from hedging exceed the costs.

Related Moves

Alan Moore is the No. 2 busiest man in the RIA business and he just convinced the No. 1 busiest man to budget $200,000 to hire a 'rockstar' to replace him

Alan Moore is CEO of both XY Planning Network and AdvicePay -- and he has three young kids; Michael Kitces agreed to let him hire a full-time replacement CEO for AdvicePay -- with some giant reqirements for the new exec.

February 14, 2023 at 3:15 AM

Five RIA Doubletakes: An RIA-only law firm breaks away • Kitces launches picker of 'best of breed' RIA software bundles • Vanguard targets 2070 just as media targets TDFs • SEC fishing for RegBI Scofflaws, including RIAs • CFP appoints first African-American chair

RIA Lawyers will reject RIA custodians• Kitces Nascar montage is now interactive and helpful • Vanguard's super long TDF draws critics• SEC supply lines are stretched with new battle front • Kamila Elliot is ex-DFA, diverse and calling CFP shots

January 12, 2022 at 3:13 AM

March 12, 2020 at 1:45 PM


Mentioned in this article:

Kitces.com
Consulting Firm
Top Executive: Michael Kitces




Bill Winterberg

Bill Winterberg

June 11, 2014 — 7:06 PM

Michael Kitces wrote about hedging AUM revenue with equity options three years ago.

<a href="http://www.kitces.com/blog/Could-Stock-Options-Be-A-Practice-Management-Tool/" rel="nofollow">Could Stock Options Be A Practice Management Tool?</a>

Brooke Southall

Brooke Southall

June 11, 2014 — 7:16 PM

Good call, Bill. It is now referenced and linked in the first line of my note.

Stephen Winks

Stephen Winks

June 11, 2014 — 8:39 PM

This hedging of fee income, not client assets, makes great sense to advisory firms run as businesses, there just are not many of them, most are run as advice product sales organizations. None-the-less the sort of reliability in income achieved can literally be taken to the bank—something very rare for advisory firms which is the institutionalization of advisory firms—not possible in advice product sales. Boslego’s thinking is ahead of the market but should be an aspirational goal of every advisory firm seeking scale, margins and high multiples..

SCW

Robert Agranov

Robert Agranov

June 11, 2014 — 8:40 PM

I’m seriously failing to see how hedging your own fees with clients money and portfolio is in the fiduciary best interests of the client? Why the best of us are so tempted by the dark side of self over gimmicks is beyond me.

Robert Boslego

Robert Boslego

June 11, 2014 — 9:01 PM

To clarify, Robert, the concept here is to hedge your own future fee income with your own money, not the client’s. This can help advisors meet a payroll and maintain marketing campaigns when fees drop under AUM pricing.

Hedging is an accepted practice in the oil and gas industry. Its a way to meet budgets and achieve strategic plans without having to bet on prices.

Robert Boslego

Robert Boslego

June 11, 2014 — 9:05 PM

Thanks, Steve. Oil businesses hedge for obtaining financing for drilling programs, which enables faster growth. Without hedging, expected income has to be discounted by a potential drop in prices and income. The same would be true of advisory businesses that derive much of their income based on AUM pricing.

Robert Boslego

Robert Boslego

June 11, 2014 — 9:16 PM

Hedging fee income gives the advisor greater certainty about its future income. This removes any conflict of interest it may have about how much risk to take investing its client’s money, assuming clients have a longer investment time horizon and are not dependent on income from the portfolio in the coming year.

Brooke Southall

Brooke Southall

June 11, 2014 — 9:48 PM

Mr. Agranov,

You certainly ask the salient question.

I believe what Mr. Boslego is saying is that fee based on AUM is against client interests because the advisor is, in effect, a short-term investor. Its principals are primarily concerned about paying the rent, making payroll etc. and may be biased to invest conservatively as a result. The investor is looking to maximize returns for retirement so he or she is a long-term investor.

By hedging fees, an advisor becomes a long-term investor through and through because concern over paying bills gets taken out of the picture.

I like the logic. Somebody can say whether the logic plays out pragmatically.

Brooke

Teresa Vollenweider

Teresa Vollenweider

June 12, 2014 — 7:27 PM

Can someone tell me if you all have heard of a thing called credit cards? Those of us in the real/normal world use them to pay for goods and services. They have a magnetic strip of them and are about 3 inches by 2 inches. Why don’t you bite the bullet and accept them? Will banks not allow so-called financial advisors/ers to accept credit cards? Can you not get merchant accounts?

Steve Planty

Steve Planty

June 13, 2014 — 2:43 PM

Theresa – What the Whaaaaa???? Why is accepting credit cards important or relevant to the conversation?

RIABiz Directory

The Industry Sourcebook for RIAs

   |    LISTING


RIABiz Directory sponsored by:

Directory Sponsor Logo